Updated 12/31: Police union,
village slated for arbitrator
Pioneer Press Online
- Glenview,IL,USA
December 31, 2008
Negotiations over a new contract between the village and Skokie Police
Department patrol officers will be placed in the hands of a binding arbitrator after the sides have failed to reach a settlement
on their own.
Under state law, each of the outstanding issues is subject to binding
arbitration, which means that the arbitrator takes each dispute and decides for either the village or the union.
Both sides paint a very different picture about the lack of progress
over a new contract after meeting for six sessions and then two more with a mediator. The Fraternal Order of Police, the union
of about 89 officers in the department, has been working without a contract since the end of April. The provisions of the
expired pact remain valid although officers have not received pay raises during that time.
Village officials maintain that the union was determined to head into
binding arbitration from the start of the process.
"I found that very unfortunate and disappointing," said Christa Ballowe,
village director of personnel. Ballowe said the village was and is interested in continuing a positive relationship with the
FOP and wanted to settle before having to move to arbitration.
"We wanted to sit down and work with them," Ballowe said. "That was always
our goal."
Ballowe said that with the terrible economy, the village expected to
negotiate a status quo contract with economic enhancements, and waited for the FOP to come down from initial proposals. There
were no give-backs in the village's offers, Ballowe said, although FOP representatives claim otherwise.
The FOP maintains that it's the village that has prevented a settlement.
"Usually, the village has been very free and open to negotiate," said
union president Glenn Wattenbarger. "We don't understand why they don't appear to be forthcoming at this time."
Vice President Mike Cremins said the FOP wanted to sit down without lawyers
and reach settlement over a pizza. That was refused by the village, he said.
Neither side wants to negotiate in public by detailing specific issues
that are still outstanding. But Ballowe said that the two sides are apart on an unprecedented 21 issues, the majority of which
have economic ramifications.
Ballowe said that she has been surprised by the FOP's unwillingness to
move from proposals in light of an ailing economy that has forced Skokie to institute a hiring freeze.
But the FOP said that neither side has changed its first major proposals.
Since so many of the proposals were presented in "packages," Wattenbarger said, it becomes difficult to detail where each
side is on individual issues.
"It's very difficult in the state that we're in to pull out individual
items," said Wattenbarger. "We were in such an early stage in negotiations on every item that things were commingled and interconnected
that they can't be pulled out and discussed separately. One affects the other."
The sides agree that among issues still on the table are pay, days off,
holidays and other work rules. Ballowe said that the patrol officers are seeking gains on issues with economic ramifications,
which has stalled the process.
According to Wattenbarger and Cremins, the village's patrol officers
have stayed in the middle in pay among 16 other area police departments in a comparable marketplace. That has always been
the stated goal of both sides.
But on issues outside of wages, it's a different story, they maintain.
"In our past contracts, we've stayed in the middle in salaries, but we've
fallen behind in other areas of interest," said Cremins. The FOP says that it is on the low end of the marketplace on work
rule issues, holidays and days off.
Village Manager Al Rigoni said the slow course of negotiations has taken
him by surprise.
"We're in a tussle with the FOP during a tough time," he said. "We would
hope that organized labor would remember the climate we're now in."
A binding arbitrator has not yet been assigned to the contract.
The last four-year contract between the two sides that expired at the
end of April was headed for binding arbitration as well. But in the end, the arbitrator became more of a mediator and was
able to inspire the sides to reach settlement on outstanding issues.
This time, the sides are less certain that will be the case, representatives
said, especially in light of so many outstanding issues